I want to
talk to you now about the science of why we are happy. This part of my program comes from the work
of Dan Gilbert. I have a video which I
show each of my clients and most of what I’m about to write comes directly from this
video. What Dan says is so important, that I want you to get it here. What he says can change your perception on happiness, and for those of you who are reading this blog, I really want you to have it in front of you so you can go back to it. There's something about seeing what's been said in written words that allows us to really grasp an idea, and this idea is radical. I want to thank Dan Gilbert for his inestimable work in this area. He really shined a light for me when I needed it.
Dan Gilbert is a Harvard psychologist and author of the New York Times best seller ‘Stumbling on Happiness.’ He believes that in our ardent pursuit of happiness, most of us have got the wrong road map. He argues that our beliefs about what will make us happy are often wrong. That our brains systematically misjudge what will make us happy, and his premise is supported by clinical research drawn from psychology and neuroscience. He challenges the idea that we’ll be miserable if we don’t get what we want. He proposes that our ‘psychological immune system’ lets us feel truly happy even when things don’t turned out as planned.
Dan Gilbert is a Harvard psychologist and author of the New York Times best seller ‘Stumbling on Happiness.’ He believes that in our ardent pursuit of happiness, most of us have got the wrong road map. He argues that our beliefs about what will make us happy are often wrong. That our brains systematically misjudge what will make us happy, and his premise is supported by clinical research drawn from psychology and neuroscience. He challenges the idea that we’ll be miserable if we don’t get what we want. He proposes that our ‘psychological immune system’ lets us feel truly happy even when things don’t turned out as planned.
So, why are
we happy? Well, about 300,000 years ago
the human brain developed what is called the prefrontal cortex. This makes us different from every other
species on the planet in that it allows us to simulate and imagine. This part of our brain is a simulator. We can experience imagined experiences in the
brain before they actually happen in life.
We can ‘test’ it out in our brains before we act it out in reality. This is very similar to what a test pilot
does in a flight simulator. A pilot will
practice flying in a simulator before he actually flies a plane. He gets to experiment and work out all the
mechanics of flying a plane in a simulator before he actually gets in a plane
and takes off. This same concept occurs
in our brain when we imagine events in our lives which we would like to
experience. We imagine experiences in
our mind before they actually happen.
What the
researchers have discovered is there is what’s called an ‘impact bias.’ What this means is that the simulator in our
brain works badly. Let me explain what I
mean by this. We would expect someone
who has won the lottery to be happier than someone who becomes paraplegic. When Dan Gilbert and his researchers examined
this and tested out the happiness scale of people who won the lottery versus
someone who’s become a paraplegic, what the data shows is that one year later,
their happiness measures about the same.
They are equally happy with their lives.
So, this impact bias is a tendency to overrate the hedonic impact of
future events. ‘Hedonic’ meaning
pleasure, feeling good, or happy. Why is
this true? Because different outcomes
are more different than they actually are.
For example, whether a person wins or loses an election, or whether you
have a relationship or not, or whether you get a promotion or you don’t get the
promotion, all of these examples have a far less impact, less intensity, and
much less duration than people expect them to have. We would expect someone who won an election
to be happier than someone who lost.
Well, a year later following the election, it turns out that their level
of happiness is probably about the same.
Why is this
true? Because happiness can be
synthesized. What do I mean by
synthesized? What do I mean by synthetic
happiness?
Sir Thomas
Browne, in 1642, in his work titled ‘Religio
Medici’ wrote:
· “I am the happiest man alive. I have that in me that can convert poverty
into riches, adversity to prosperity, and I am more invulnerable than Achilles,
fortune hath not one place to hit me.”
What is he
talking about? Sir Thomas knew that we
have this machine in our brain that converts negative experiences and events in
our lives to something positive. We
human beings have what might be called a ‘psychological immune system’. This is a system of cognitive processes,
largely these are non-conscious cognitive processes that help us change the
view of the world so that we can feel better about the world we find ourselves
in.
We
synthesize happiness but ironically we think happiness is something not to be
found. Are there examples of people who
have been able to find happiness after experiencing challenging and upsetting
events in their lives? Who were able to
synthesize their happiness and turn lemons into lemonade?
I’m going to share with you a few examples of
people who have actually done this. Jim
Wright was a Democratic congressman in the 1990’s, he was chairman of the House
of Representatives, and he resigned in disgrace after an up-and-coming
Republican named Newt Gingrich found out he’d done this shady book deal. As a consequence, Jim Wright lost everything
– power, prestige, money – and he was the most powerful Democrat at that time. What did Jim Wright, this disgraced
congressman have to say about this years later.
He said:
·
“I am so much better off, physically,
financially, mentally, and in almost every way.”
Here’s
another example of a man who was able to synthesize his happiness after
experiencing what many of us would consider a horrible tragedy. A guy named Morese Bickham, spent 37 years in
prison for a crime he didn't do. After
DNA evidence confirmed he was innocent, he was released from prison, at the age
of 78. Now, what did he have to say
about his experience being wrongfully imprisoned for 37 years? He said:
·
“I don’t have one minute’s
regret. It was a glorious experience.”
He said it
was glorious?! How could he find being
wrongfully imprisoned for a crime he didn't do a glorious experience? To our minds, this is impossible to fathom,
nevertheless, this was his experience.
Here’s
another example: Pete Best was the
original drummer of the Beatles before they dropped him and picked up Ringo
Starr and later became ‘The Beatles’. He
was interviewed in 1994; he was still a drummer, still a musician, still
playing music. What did he have to
say? He could have been a part of one of
the most important bands of the 20th Century! He said:
· “I’m happier than I would have been with
The Beatles.”
Well, of
course, we’re going to say ‘Yeah right.
Sure, ok.’ We smile at this and
chuckle, and basically we deduce it in our minds that the person didn't really
want that job, or you’re just trying to make a bad situation better, or you
didn't really have that much in common with your ex-fiance and you figured that
out just about the time she threw the ring back in your face! But why do we smirk at other people’s ability
to synthesize their happiness? We smirk
because we think that synthetic happiness is not of the same quality as what we
would consider natural happiness.
What is
natural happiness? Natural happiness is
what we get when we get what we wanted.
Synthetic happiness is what we make when we don’t get what we wanted. In our society we think that synthetic
happiness is of an inferior quality to natural happiness. Where does this belief come from? Well, what kind of an economic engine that
keeps churning over and over again, creating more and more consumers, how could
that engine keep going if we believed that not getting what we wanted could
make us just as happy as getting what we wanted! Dan Gilbert suggests to us that synthetic
happiness is every bit as real, enduring, and of the quality and kind of
happiness that you get when you get what you are aiming for.
This kind of
happiness is about accepting the things that you cannot change, and having the
wisdom to recognize that. Here’s a bit
of irony for you: the freedom that we
all cherish, the freedom to make up your mind and the ability to change your
mind, which allows us to choose all these delicious, enticing futures that we
have before us, it’s the friend of natural happiness, but it is the enemy to
synthetic happiness. Synthetic happiness
works when we recognize there are certain things we simply cannot change! Plato says, “What is once done, can never be
undone.” When we can finally accept
that, we can engage the psychological immune system to convert that negative
experience, that traumatic event, into something more palatable which enables
us to gain a healthier perspective of our own lives, and find happiness where
we are right now.
This
‘psychological immune system’ works best when we are totally stuck, when we are
totally trapped. When we have no
other choice but to keep moving forward.
We have to find a way to be happy within the given circumstances of our
lives, otherwise we get imprisoned in the ‘what ifs’ or ‘I should have done
this’ or ‘I’m a failure’, which only prevents us from activating the non-conscious
cognitive processes innate to us which will bring us out of the past and into
our present happiness. This attribute
that we have which is clinical verified is something that most people don’t
know about themselves and this can work to our disadvantage.
There was a
study done by Dan Gilbert and his researchers at Harvard where they offered a
photography course to the students in which they would take lots of pictures of
Harvard, their ‘memories of Harvard’, and at the end of the course, the students
would get the opportunity to select and keep one of their two best pictures
they had photographed. The purpose
behind this study was to understand the psychology underlying the unanticipated
joy of being totally stuck. The students
were asked to participate in this photography course and at the end of the
course they were going to get to choose two of their best pictures, and one of
them, they were going to get to keep, the other they would have to
relinquish. For half the class Dan and
his group told the students they could change their mind, they had the freedom
to change their mind, and they had up to 4 days to do that. The other half of the class was told that
once they chose the picture that was it.
The other picture was being sent away right after class, mailed off to
England somewhere. The students had no
option to change their mind.
So the
decision was for half the class reversible, 4 days to make a swap, and the
other half was irreversible, they could never swap. The students were asked whether they could
predict their satisfaction 3 days later or they could go away and report what
their satisfaction was in 3 days and then again in 6 days. What the results were was that those who
could not change their minds really liked the picture that they chose. This group’s satisfaction actually
increased. However, those students who
had the option of deliberating, who had the freedom to choose, didn't like
their picture. ‘Is this the right one?
Did I chose the right one? I think I
like the other one. The other one was
better. Why did I pick this one?’ They had this constant turmoil going on in
their minds as to which picture was better.
It made them not like the picture they chose, and even after the
opportunity to swap the pictures expired; they still didn't like their
picture! Why? This occurred because the reversible
condition is not conducive to the synthesis of happiness!
Dan and his
researchers conducted another similar study on another group of Harvard
students a little bit later and in this study they asked the students which
photography course they would take: a course where the choice of their two best
pictures at the end would be reversible or irreversible? 66% chose the reversible course, where they
would have the option to deliberate on which of their two pictures they wanted
to keep, not realizing of course, based on the previous study, they will
ultimately be deeply dissatisfied with their picture! Because they did not know the conditions
under which synthetic happiness grows!
Shakespeare
said this: ‘Tis nothing good or bad, But
thinking makes it so!’ Now wait a
minute, is this really true? Is nothing
really good or bad? Well Dan Gilbert
makes a very salient point about this idea towards the end of this video which
I share with you now. He says that “yes,
there are some things better than others, and we should have the preferences
that lead us to one future or another, no question. But when these preferences drive us too hard,
or too fast, because we have overrated the differences between these two
futures, we are at risk. When our
ambitions are bounded, it leads us to work joyfully. And when our ambitions are unbounded, it
leads us to lie, cheat, to steal, to hurt others, to sacrifice things of real value. When our fears are bounded, we
are prudent, cautious, thoughtful, considerate, and kind. And yet, when our fears are un-bounded and
overblown, we can be reckless and we can be cowardly.”
Dan leaves
us with a lesson to be gained at the end of this video, which I really want you
to have. He says, “Our longings and our
worries are both to some degree overblown because we have within us the
capacity to manufacture the very commodity we are constantly chasing when we
choose experience.”
What is important to take away from this blog? Life sometimes gives us experiences that are a challenge to overcome. When we refuse to take in these events and process them, and instead suppress them, it does major psychological, emotional, and spiritual damage to our beings. With Post-Traumatic Soul Distress, Depression, and Trauma we are dealt a heavy hand. Our souls are in trouble. There’s a big gaping hole inside of us which paralyzes us and keeps us from finding a way to navigate out of the pain, and retrieve the joy of our own existence we once had. But now we know from the work of Dan Gilbert we have a power within us that is able to convert those traumas in our lives and enable us to find the good, and thus, make peace with the past, which ultimately allows us to synthesize our happiness, so we can then build towards a better future. We are able to do this through a ‘psychological immune system’ that is already built into us. If we allow it to freely function without our interference, if we understand it and recognize its value in our lives, we can fundamentally change how we view the negative events that happened to us.
What is important to take away from this blog? Life sometimes gives us experiences that are a challenge to overcome. When we refuse to take in these events and process them, and instead suppress them, it does major psychological, emotional, and spiritual damage to our beings. With Post-Traumatic Soul Distress, Depression, and Trauma we are dealt a heavy hand. Our souls are in trouble. There’s a big gaping hole inside of us which paralyzes us and keeps us from finding a way to navigate out of the pain, and retrieve the joy of our own existence we once had. But now we know from the work of Dan Gilbert we have a power within us that is able to convert those traumas in our lives and enable us to find the good, and thus, make peace with the past, which ultimately allows us to synthesize our happiness, so we can then build towards a better future. We are able to do this through a ‘psychological immune system’ that is already built into us. If we allow it to freely function without our interference, if we understand it and recognize its value in our lives, we can fundamentally change how we view the negative events that happened to us.
It is a
choice. We have the free will to stay
stuck, keep re-living the traumas over and over again in our minds, or we can
take the time to transform them, and allow this built-in mechanism in our minds
to convert that trauma, that pain, that suffering, into good. We must recognize and own the power that we
have within us to convert all of what has happened to us into fertilizer where
we plant new seeds and grow into the people we are capable of becoming. These traumas and pains can serve as
fertilizer to being the best version of ourselves. We must take the time necessary to cultivate
this new self who is emerging by tending to our wounds and healing them. We have the mechanism already built in to us
if we will give ourselves the permission to tap into it. It will synthesize those events for you and
the feeling of happiness will replace all feelings of suffering. Remember, nothing outside of you can give you
what you already have. You have it
within you to be who it is you want to be.
When we are being who we want to be, the outside world will start to
mirror that feeling and belief to us more and more. Soon you will grow beyond the limitations
that have been imposed upon you. The
traumas will continue to diminish in their power over you until they no longer
hold sway over you and your right to be happy and free. It’s time to empower yourselves. Take in this information I am providing you,
digest it, use it, and utilize it in your daily life. You have the power within you to make the
transformations in your life you so deeply long to have. Begin the transformation today.
----------------------------------------------------
Charlie Pacello is a PTSD, Depression, and Healing Trauma Recovery Expert and Life Coach, a former US Air Force Lieutenant, and creator of the program, 'Lt. Pacello's Life Training Program.' He can be reached by visiting his website at www.charliepacello.com